The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today released an opinion in PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT v. FERC, No. 03-72511, an administrative appeal. The panel consisted of James R. Browning, Harry Pregerson, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

BERZON, Circuit Judge:
The energy crisis in 2000-2001 resulted in extreme power shortages and price volatility in California and other western states. This consolidated appeal raises several interrelated issues concerning a series of wholesale energy contracts for future energy supplies — known as “forward” contracts -entered into by power companies in California, Nevada, and Washington during the energy crisis. Petitioners, including retail power companies and state agencies, contended before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that the contracts should be modified, but FERC concluded that they should not be. Petitioners (the “local utilities”) now allege that FERC, in so deciding, did not appropriately apply the just and reasonable standard set by section 206(a) of the Federal Power Act (FPA). They allege that FERC erred in applying the Mobile-. . .

This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 19th, 2006 at 10:00 am and is filed under Administrative. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.